millionaireInvest

Monday, 6 June 2022

[New post] Plastic Recycling Doesn’t Work and Will Never Work

Site logo image marketingscoops posted: " Monday, June 6, 2022 About Us Contact Privacy Policy Cookies Policy DISCLAIMER Term Of Use DMCA Covid-19 World Politics Business Technology En" https://onlinemarketingscoops.com

Plastic Recycling Doesn't Work and Will Never Work

marketingscoops

Jun 6

  • Monday, June 6, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • DISCLAIMER
  • Term Of Use
  • DMCA

VigourTimes

  • Covid-19
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Health
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Lifestyle
  • Travel
  • Food
  • Art
  • Culture
  • Family
  • More
  • Home
  • Ideas
  • Plastic Recycling Doesn't Work and Will Never Work
Ideas

Plastic Recycling Doesn't Work and Will Never Work

By Don Williams Last updated May 30, 2022
0
Share

 

Americans support recycling. We do too. But although some materials can be effectively recycled and safely made from recycled content, plastics cannot. Plastic recycling does not work and will never work. The United States in 2021 had a dismal recycling rate of about 5 percent for post-consumer plastic waste, down from a high of 9.5 percent in 2014, when the U.S. exported millions of tons of plastic waste to China and counted it as recycled—even though much of it wasn't.

Recycling in general can be an effective way to reclaim natural material resources. The U.S.'s high recycling rate of paper, 68 percent, proves this point. The problem with recycling plastic lies not with the concept or process but with the material itself.

The first problem is that there are thousands of different plastics, each with its own composition and characteristics. They all include different chemical additives and colorants that cannot be recycled together, making it impossible to sort the trillions of pieces of plastics into separate types for processing. For example, polyethylene terephthalate (PET#1) bottles cannot be recycled with PET#1 clamshells, which are a different PET#1 material, and green PET#1 bottles cannot be recycled with clear PET#1 bottles (which is why South Korea has outlawed colored PET#1 bottles.) High-density polyethylene (HDPE#2), polyvinyl chloride (PVC#3), low-density polyethylene (LDPE#4), polypropylene (PP#5), and polystyrene (PS#6) all must be separated for recycling.

Just one fast-food meal can involve many different types of single-use plastic, including PET#1, HDPE#2, LDPE#4, PP#5, and PS#6 cups, lids, clamshells, trays, bags, and cutlery, which cannot be recycled together. This is one of several reasons why plastic fast-food service items cannot be legitimately claimed as recyclable in the U.S.

Another problem is that the reprocessing of plastic waste—when possible at all—is wasteful. Plastic is flammable, and the risk of fires at plastic-recycling facilities affects neighboring communities—many of which are located in low-income communities or communities of color.

Unlike metal and glass, plastics are not inert. Plastic products can include toxic additives and absorb chemicals, and are generally collected in curbside bins filled with possibly dangerous materials such as plastic pesticide containers. According to a report published by the Canadian government, toxicity risks in recycled plastic prohibit "the vast majority of plastic products and packaging produced" from being recycled into food-grade packaging.

Yet another problem is that plastic recycling is simply not economical. Recycled plastic costs more than new plastic because collecting, sorting, transporting, and reprocessing plastic waste is exorbitantly expensive. The petrochemical industry is rapidly expanding, which will further lower the cost of new plastic.

Despite this stark failure, the plastics industry has waged a decades-long campaign to perpetuate the myth that the material is recyclable. This campaign is reminiscent of the tobacco industry's efforts to convince smokers that filtered cigarettes are healthier than unfiltered cigarettes.

Conventional mechanical recycling, in which plastic waste is ground up and melted, has been around for many decades. Now the plastics industry is touting the benefits of so-called chemical recycling— in which plastic waste is broken down using high heat or more chemicals and turned into a low-quality fossil fuel.

In 2018, Dow Chemical claimed that the Renewlogy chemical-recycling plant in Salt Lake City was able to reprocess mixed plastic waste from Boise, Idaho, households through the "Hefty EnergyBag" program and turn it into diesel fuel. As Reuters exposed in a 2021 investigation, however,  all the different types of plastic waste contaminated the pyrolysis process. Today, Boise burns its mixed plastic waste in cement kilns, resulting in climate-warming carbon emissions. This well-documented Renewlogy failure has not stopped the plastics industry from continuing to claim that chemical recycling works for "mixed plastics."

Chemical recycling is not viable. It has failed and will continue to fail for the same down-to-earth, real-world reasons that the conventional mechanical recycling of plastics has consistently failed. Worse yet, its toxic emissions could cause new harm to our environment, climate, and health.

We're not making a case for despair. Just the opposite. We need the facts so that individuals and policy makers can take concrete action. Proven solutions to the U.S.'s plastic-waste and pollution problems exist and can be quickly replicated across the country. These solutions include enacting bans on single-use plastic bags and unrecyclable single-use plastic food-service products, ensuring widespread access to water-refilling stations, installing dishwashing equipment in schools to allow students to eat food on real dishes rather than single-use plastics, and switching Meals on Wheels and other meal-delivery programs from disposables to reusable dishware.

If the plastics industry is following the tobacco industry's playbook, it may never admit to the failure of plastics recycling. Although we may not be able to stop them from trying to fool us, we can pass effective laws to make real progress. Single-use-plastic bans reduce waste, save taxpayer money spent on disposal and cleanup, and reduce plastic pollution in the environment.

Consumers can put pressure on companies to stop filling store shelves with single-use plastics by not buying them and instead choosing reusables and products in better packaging. And we should all keep recycling our paper, boxes, cans, and glass, because that actually works.

 

 

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Vigour Times is an automatic aggregator of the all world's media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – admin@vigourtimes.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

 

 

Canadian governmentcarbon emissionscost of new plastic.Despitedecades-long campaigndifferent chemical additivesdifferent plasticsdifferent types of single-use plasticdismal recycling rate
0
Share
Don Williams

Prev Post

Newly colourised pictures of the Queen show her throughout her youth

Next Post

Johnny Depp surprise performance: Actor jams out in England as jury debates Heard defamation case, video shows

Leave a comment
Ideas

Could America's Lucky Streak on Assassinations Be Running Out?

By Don Williams Last updated Jun 5, 2022
0
Share

 

Any individual murder in the United States right now is unlikely to make much of an impression—not when elderly Black people at a grocery store or young children at school are being gunned down in large groups. But the Friday murder of a retired judge in Wisconsin is ominous enough to give some pause.

Although little is known so far, authorities say they believe that the killing was politically motivated. The victim, Jack Roemer, 68, had served on the local circuit court. Police said he was found tied to a chair and shot at his home. (The alleged assassin was found with a self-inflicted wound and hospitalized.) What relationship, if any, the two men had is not clear—"It appears to be related to the judicial system," Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul said in a news conference—but the suspect also had a list of other potential targets, which news outlets have reported to include Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers, a Democrat; Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, also a Democrat; and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican.

Given McConnell's presence, that list doesn't lend itself to straightforward ideological interpretation. More information might shed some light on what agenda, if any, the shooter had that linked all of the targets, or if there were others. Regardless, the incident is chilling for what it might augur. Assassination remains rare in the United States, but in the past it has spiked at times of acute national tension, including following the Civil War, around the turn of the 20th century, and in the '60s. In a country as divided and angry as the United States is today, it's surprising that more assassinations haven't occurred. Perhaps this one is a sign of what's to come.

As uncommon as high-profile assassinations are, they tend to leave a deep mark. The killings of Abraham Lincoln, John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, Medgar Evers, and Martin Luther King Jr. are pivotal moments in American history. The Ku Klux Klan committed a string of politically motivated murders during Reconstruction that aimed to hasten its end, and Presidents James Garfield and William McKinley were killed in 1881 and 1901, respectively.

(McKinley's successor, Theodore Roosevelt, survived a shooting in 1912, and his distant cousin Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933 dodged a bullet that instead killed the mayor of Chicago.) Not since the wounding of Ronald Reagan by John Hinckley Jr. in 1981 has a president been in serious jeopardy, but U.S. political figures are regular subjects of threats, attempts, and occasionally murder.

Assassination is understudied and undertheorized, the scholar Arie Perliger observed in 2015. But the academic literature that does exist seems to point to many of the hallmarks of current-day America as warning signs. Perliger noted that countries that see "strong polarization and fragmentation" and "lack consensual political ethos and homogeneous populations (in terms of the national and ethnic landscape)" are more prone to assassinations.

A government committee, convened after RFK's and King's assassinations and led by Milton Eisenhower, a college administrator and President Dwight D. Eisenhower's younger brother, found in 1969 that not just division but major societal shifts lead to assassinations: "Levels of political violence appear to crest during periods of accelerated social change." The panel also found some specific risk factors in American society.

"Recent years have seen a number of movements that justify violence as a legitimate tactic in seeking political ends," the committee's report stated. "There has been frequent use of rhetoric vilifying institutions and individuals … In addition, some segments of the population view our democratic government as ineffectual in meeting the needs of its people."

The Eisenhower commission was able to conclude brightly that "the likelihood of assassination should decrease as the level of political unrest within the country diminishes." This message is less comforting today. A Washington Post/University of Maryland poll earlier this year found that one in three Americans, including 40 percent of Republicans, believes violence against the government is sometimes justified. Former President Donald Trump and others have waged a concerted campaign against government institutions. They have also argued, in sometimes overtly fascist tones, that democracy has failed, voters' will must be overturned, and only a strongman can fix what ails the country.

Whenever violence breaks out, those who have fostered anger, justified violence, and attacked institutions tend to disclaim any responsibility, often blaming the perpetrator's apparent mental illness. One of the more troubling findings of the Eisenhower commission, though, is that moments of national strife produce assassinations even though many killers aren't personally ideologically motivated. ("Most assassinations in the United States have been the products of individual passion or derangement," the commission noted.)

Maybe the United States has only gotten lucky that there haven't been more assassinations already. Security around presidents and other politicians is much tighter than it was in the '60s. That hasn't kept some people from trying to kill politicians. President Barack Obama was the subject of multiple assassination threats. In 2017, a domestic terrorist fueled by hatred for Republicans shot and injured four people, including House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, who were practicing for the Congressional Baseball Game.

In 2018, Cesar Sayoc, a Trump superfan who lawyers said suffered from untreated mental illness, mailed pipe bombs to a variety of people he'd identified as Trump enemies.  In 2020, a disgruntled lawyer fueled by racism and sexism tried to kill a federal judge in New Jersey, killing her son instead. Later in 2020, several men were arrested for plotting to kill Whitmer. And on January 6, 2021, some members of the mob that stormed the U.S. Capitol declared that they wanted to kill House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Vice President Mike Pence. (Upon hearing that some rioters chanted "Hang Mike Pence," Trump reportedly remarked that maybe Pence should be hanged.)

Taken together, these incidents suggest that the relative scarcity of assassinations in recent years might not be a result of a lack of would-be assassins but rather a streak of good luck. As long as the nation remains viciously divided, its luck might not hold out forever.

By: Don Williams

Source: Plastic Recycling Doesn't Work and Will Never Work - Vigour Times

Comment

Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from https://onlinemarketingscoops.com.
Change your email settings at manage subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
https://onlinemarketingscoops.com/plastic-recycling-doesnt-work-and-will-never-work/

Powered by WordPress.com
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play
at June 06, 2022
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Generate a catchy title for a collection of newfangled games of the past that wont make you miss a beat

Write a newfangled query where { query -> QueryResult ( ) } is the one that should be called, and should be one of the <query>. An ...

  • [New post] How Automation Drives Business Growth and Efficiency
    marke...
  • [New post] The Future Is Here: How Artificial Intelligence Can Help You With Your Studies
    marke...
  • [New post] Kevin McCarthy busts Fox News host: ‘Maria, you’re saying things that are not true’
    ...

Search This Blog

  • Home

About Me

Millionaire— a title you may have imagined while picturing a seven figure bank balance.
View my complete profile

Report Abuse

Blog Archive

  • August 2024 (510)
  • July 2024 (717)
  • June 2024 (544)
  • January 2024 (1)
  • December 2023 (2)
  • June 2023 (158)
  • May 2023 (1398)
  • April 2023 (1217)
  • March 2023 (1327)
  • February 2023 (1055)
  • January 2023 (1394)
  • December 2022 (1281)
  • November 2022 (1021)
  • October 2022 (879)
  • September 2022 (874)
  • August 2022 (1334)
  • July 2022 (1003)
  • June 2022 (1030)
  • May 2022 (1189)
  • April 2022 (1090)
  • March 2022 (1045)
  • February 2022 (785)
  • January 2022 (942)
  • December 2021 (1234)
  • November 2021 (3182)
  • October 2021 (3224)
  • September 2021 (3138)
  • August 2021 (3283)
  • July 2021 (3173)
  • June 2021 (210)
Powered by Blogger.