Posted BY: Teresa | NwoReport
As we reported on Tuesday, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg was desperately trying to stave off the House investigation into the question of the political nature of his prosecution of former President Donald Trump.
Bragg filed a suit against the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), arguing the investigation was a "transparent campaign to intimidate and attack" his case against former President Donald Trump. He sought to get a temporary restraining order blocking the subpoena that the Committee issued to Mark Pomerantz, a former assistant district attorney in Bragg's office who oversaw the investigation into Trump before he left the DA's office. Bragg also tried to block the Committee from getting "confidential documents and testimony from the district attorney himself as well as his current and former employees and officials."
Bragg is trying to do all he can not to comply, claiming he was taking action "in response to an unprecedently [sic] brazen and unconstitutional attack by members of Congress on an ongoing New York State criminal prosecution and investigation of former President Donald J. Trump."
But the judge in the matter did not agree. U.S. District Court Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil, a Trump appointee, denied the request from Alvin Bragg for a temporary restraining order against Rep. Jordan. In the denial, the judge noted that Bragg didn't even provide documents he should have to support his cause, including that "subpoena purportedly served on Mr. Pomerantz" as well as the "Declaration of Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.," which is mentioned in Bragg's moving papers. Sounds like Bragg didn't help himself, and the judge is chiding him for failure to have everything he should have had for such a motion.
Full Story
No comments:
Post a Comment