The Trump presidency, Trump's "I'm with you" chant. pic.twitter.com/7F0qEpNrQX — Jake Tapper (@TapperJAK) September 8, 2016
The idea that America has left no decision about its role in the European Union was a popular one in 2014, when the president's inauguration was interrupted by a protester at the National Mall. When Mitt Romney took the stage on Friday night, the president took a stance in which he criticized Germany's immigration policies.
While President Obama's policies would increase American exports, his policies would actually shrink the value of German exports and put American businesses under an unsustainable fiscal burden.
This would in turn result in job losses and a spike in the number of European immigrants entering our nation's capital. It would also exacerbate the economic recession that has already been hurting American workers with stagnant wages, despite many of these jobs being created in European countries like Germany. According to the Institute for Supply Management, nearly a third of American jobs would be eliminated or partially eliminated in the future if Germany had a significant portion of the economic growth it can generate.
And that's a huge deal!
Write a polemic about how we shouldn't just be afraid of being accused.
He says something along those lines:
I don't think people were born with these beliefs just based on their sexuality, their social views.
This is where you get the big guns. The whole point of Islamophobia – and why it's a dangerous idea to have an ideology and practice one – is to make sure that everyone's opinions are held to the same standard.
"It's okay to be offended by a certain kind of person who doesn't conform to your religious values. There are things that can be said about us that we don't agree with. We can't defend what we believe in. We should be free to express our opinions because some people don't like it."
What does all this mean for our political system? It means many are not ready for change. After all, every major vote a politician has made is seen as a vote, but what happens if those votes are seen as an insult to the faith? What's worse, if those votes have proven to be wrong?
And now, it is time to get creative, so we can get on the right side of history. If the government's policies have been going very well for at least this quarter of a century, how else can we ask ourselves how they can be the same for decades to come in some form? Is there anyone in America who hasn't had it figured out,
Write a polemic on Trump's supposed opposition to trade.
The latest batch of tweets from the right-wing troll, @JebBushTrump, have been deleted.
1) @JebBushTrump on Trump's tax bill saying he can't be bothered to tell people his debt is a "terrible thing." pic.twitter.com/0Gm1hYMdD1 — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) February 21, 2017
Just another tweet from @JebBushTrump making jokes about the "cabal" of Democrats. Just another example — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) February 21, 2017
3) @JebBushTrump tells his audience that they're "getting my money's worth" of food money. — Ben Jacobs (@Bjacobs) February 21, 2017
And the latest tweet to take down their offending timeline:
4) @JebBushTrump says #stoprebranding #taxcheatshow if you can't fight this — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) February 21, 2017
Here's the original tweet:
A: @JebBushTrump & Paul Joseph Watson are going to show you your "corporate income tax rates" pic.twitter.com/PXJ6Gr5Y9H — The Center for American Progress (@CenterForACProgress) February 22, 2017
A: @JebBushTrump
Write a polemic against the U.S. military and the state of foreign policy with a video from his online presence.
During his campaign, Mr. Trump made a number of inflammatory remarks about Iran, and he had criticized North Korea, accusing the Chinese of "attacking us," and urging the U.S. military to be "strong enough." He also said the U.S. was "the biggest loser of our last war" that he had ever faced and declared that he would not have left America if we had not become allies with China.
In a letter to Fox News Wednesday, Mr. Trump asked for a copy of his book to be returned to the White House if he was unable to do "some good to prevent future mistakes." Mr. Trump said he would like the book to be returned to the White House. "When you're in a position where your position is threatened by a lot of reckless behavior, you give it a shot," he said.
Mr. Trump's comments on the North Korean situation have come the night before The New York Times' Michael Nutter and The Washington Post's Tim Carney published news articles about the Trump administration's foreign policy. The first headline in each story noted that "Trump's threats to North Korea 'threats America.'" The second story attributed Trump's comments to Mr. Clapper, former CIA director Michael R. Clapper Jr., former national security adviser Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn and former national security
Write a polemic about his work and his opinions, it's safe to assume that there will be many who will respond with the same kind of venom. But the problem was that my work was not at all a commentary on the politics of the time. No, it was an exploration of how he saw the world and how he came to understand America.
It's not about politics; it's about the way I went about taking care of that work. And this was in the 20th century, the time that the American dream was dying down the country. So what happened between those two different eras was that people started to see both side of the story, which is that we weren't always interested in how people actually got to be people. There were things about America that got written about that people wanted to do. So people started to follow what happened.
I spent a lot of time studying American history and talking about it with some of the best historians we've ever dealt with. And then we had a kind of a new era in American history where we were really concerned about history because it was coming out slowly and the people were doing it in an open house. Then everyone was going to write books and it should be, well we're telling you something that might be important to people right now, and it's important to the people as well. What I'm trying to say, in fact, is, I was never going to just start putting out books. I wasn
Write a polemic about the New York Times with the title: "New York Times editors at the heart of anti-Semitic hatred
Don't just defend [the paper] on its lies and misconstrued history. Stand them up. Ask them about Israel!"
Last July, the Times and the New York Magazine each published six columns, with a total of 11.5.
"Even when a majority of the readers of the Times think otherwise, a disproportionate number consider the column to be an abomination," the magazine's editor-in-chief, Glenn Sorkin, wrote in an email to The Intercept.
The Times reported that the editors wanted to "explain the importance of freedom of expression," but it ultimately ran a "narrowly divided" piece which included a call to boycott the column, despite calling the piece anti-Semitic. It's unclear what other topics were included in that piece, which cited the Times' "overly negative coverage", "lack of respect for Jews, and lack of tolerance for the Palestinian struggle".
It wasn't until later in the year that the Times retracted its claim that it wrote a column that said the anti-Semites at the Post were among the most racist Jews on the planet, a decision that helped fuel a furious Twitterstorm earlier this week.
But a few points remain in support of the column – and that's especially true of articles attacking the media for "misconstru
Write a polemic on Twitter: http://t.co/Tx4dKx7d0X — Ben Jacobs (@BenJacobs) April 24, 2014
For a lot of American conservatives, and particularly conservatives of colour with which I've always been involved, the notion of racism is pretty much the whole point.
"It's as if white people and those with them have control of our lives," said a white Republican who went by the nom-de-guerre and who gave him an alias 'Wife-Racism'. "So we've said this if we're just playing along for entertainment and whatever — but at least we're able to stand up and get the message across that white people need a job."
And although, perhaps unsurprisingly, white conservatives are all too willing to make an anti-black speech about white privilege — including their own — and to accuse other groups of racism for their own bigotry, to some Trump supporters it looks like they still have their own issues.
When Trump's White House announced Thursday it would no longer be accepting federal funding to provide welfare programs for the most vulnerable and sickest Americans, some white conservatives took the comments very seriously and took to social media. One tweeted that they would "love to see the US Congress get a better handle on immigration reform this year because this was already in the president's top 3 priorities."
So, yeah, it seems like that's one way to
Write a polemic against the Republican Party, the "socialists" or the liberals.
A conservative, like Sanders, should not take the leadership of the Party and its message across the country to stand up to the liberal Democrats.
If you are a progressive Democrat speaking against the Republican party, do not vote for me. I am against government spending and taxes. I voted in 2008 because I felt that a political party must unite those who hate the status quo. I backed John McCain and Marco Rubio in the 2010 election because of their positions on entitlements, Social Security, health care, education and social security. It's not about you.
I am to remain opposed to "too many" entitlements and the endless wars of conquest, and to pass a balanced budget. I am against the war in Iraq and the "war on terror." These are two sides of the same coin.
The other one is with America at war with a corrupt and oppressive government and corrupt public sector. America's "big business" and powerful corporations have made big business so powerful it is hard to ignore their global domination of the world, the media and the system.
Bernie Sanders and I need to be unified against the war in Iraq (and other wars in the world) and against mass incarceration. We need to be more on the side of those who have been unfairly punished and who continue to receive enormous financial and educational benefits from Wall Street. Many of us will no longer
Write a polemic against the "bigots", but not always. It's also worth giving some credit to James Burden's "Toxic Politics" article here, where he lays out the "biggest mistakes of the 20th century that have been made" during his lifetime – such as the "the most corrupt and incompetent administration in the history of the United States" – and how many of his many sins he committed. Here are some links in a nutshell to their posts…
I agree with him in this post on the need for a political movement against "bigotry", but I still think that the first step to achieving this is a political consensus. As long as he has a chance, I'd be open to suggestions, but the next one may be even more of the same old thing, like "The "SJWs" were only "tough" at the time…
That's the one thing I do prefer…
Advertisements
Write a polemic with 'Allahu Akbar' verse. It is important to note that it is a quote from a Quranic verse as it would be a contradiction of verse 12 [the verse on the earth] and verse 4. Therefore it is not obligatory to make a polemic that is so negative and it cannot be applied to anything. The Quranic verse on the earth refers to these verses stating that the people cannot come forward in God's footsteps until a new prophet enters the earth. Now as I already mentioned that is problematic because the Quranic verse on the earth is a quote from a Quranic verse. This verse also states "Allahu Akbar".
However, if you want to make a polemic to call God is a better place to practice. It will help you learn the different words and phrases and I want to say this.
Allah said (2:143):
'You shall not be called to worship nor worship in the earth'.
Now Allah sent to you the words of the Messenger, in regard to God's commandments and His Prophet. If you learn these words, then you have a very good chance of learning in the world!
Allah said (1:139/2):
Therefore it is obligatory to make a polemic against the believers. It is like the words "allahu Akbar" in that you can say:
"Treat your adversary with great care."
And Allah said
No comments:
Post a Comment