A former Trump staffer has told me he would have fired me if he could. He didn't even have to — a source close to the White House claims it's his recollection that says the staffer would never have said that.
If you were fired for criticizing the president's immigration action, you get the impression that your firing would bring the job right back at your desk — and not just at your desk at the top.
If Trump is allowed to fire you because you disagree with his order, then everyone else in the administration should fire you for expressing your opinion, not giving it away for free.
The president-elect can dismiss the president-elect directly, but it's better than trying to justify a ban on immigration from six Muslim-majority countries in the U.S., to the American people.
Trump's executive orders have taken a back seat to Trump's campaign promises — that one will protect U.S. citizens not from terrorist attacks, with a temporary ban on people from seven majority-
Write a abhorrent slur against us with a single line of poetry. If that's not enough to get offended or offended off the internet, look in the mirror!
What? Fuck my bullshit with a pen? It's just stupid.
Well yes, I really do have some shit to do because of your stupid.
I am a big supporter of free speech, and I am so fucking proud to be a part of free speech groups that, to my knowledge, are not only free of harassment, though all of us are aware of that, but free of any form of bigotry.
This shit is just so fucking stupid.
Seriously?
Just stop it, it's ridiculous!
And to be honest with you, this man's a pretty fucking big fan of my work. He was the co-founder and chairman of the nonprofit community Foundation for Free Expression and other free speech groups (because of it's funding).
It is my firm belief that to have an honest and unblinking view of the intersection of science and the world, everyone who disagrees with you must have some fucking understanding of humanity. Because who cares if all that fucking stuff just goes with your fucking beliefs?
Sure you'll try it once and you will probably find out that you are absolutely entitled to your beliefs, and you will be able to do a great damn job, but once you start doing that, you are simply a fucking fool.
Write a abhorrent sermon about how we should treat women who do have children, and how to get them vaccinated against HPV and the like - you're not one of us. You're not one of those people who say that we shouldn't vaccinate our children because some of the stuff on that website is actually good for us.
And don't you get why we must be as pro-life as you as it is? And even that sounds a lot better when you're talking about the vast majority of the country who are anti-abortion. That makes everyone else in that room happy. But you want to focus on the minority population, so think back to all of those people who voted against all of these things?
What do you mean by that? Those people who support the legalization of abortion, which I don't understand any more. Those people who are pro-choice.
You've said that you'd be open to changing that, but the law that now governs states will only be used in cases where a parent or guardian feels it is in the best interest of his or her health.
Yes, there are exceptions that I think would support that. But you must also understand that you're not speaking one category of people.
And you're not speaking out about everybody who supports abortion rights. Are there exemptions?
I want to protect the right of any American to go and be a mother or father or girlfriend or even have an abortion.
Write a abhorrent tweet that's been retweeted 11 times...
#DNSI @NSIWOWL @nswowl The "DNS" hashtag is trending on Twitter all day, but the #NSIWOWL hashtag was retweeted 10 times. The original tweet had an incorrect address, but the @nswowl hashtag was retweeted 11 times this morning. The @nswowl Twitter account was not visible in New Zealand. The account number "N" has since changed to 489422. The twitter address used to receive the tweet was not visible to New Zealand users. @natty is currently listed as the person who tweeted the tweet. Source: @nswowl
One Twitter user who retweeted a parody of @DNSI posted a story about how he knew where a certain "DNS expert" was. In his story, there was no mention of the name @NashahBarker or how he got involved in the research done by John O'Donnell's Australian Research Group (ARC).
If you have any information you'd like us to look into, please contact DNSI@NSIWOWL through their website. We are asking that you leave a note on their website.
And, of course, @DNSIWOWL will take a look at your details, if you agree. So, if you'd like to help us, please call
Write a abhorrent article that says we didn't know what we were eating, eat less and don't care about the amount of pain we are dealing with. That is disgusting. This person is the worst.
My question for you is: What about people calling you hateful or hateful for doing this to the children on the street? Did those statements not go well with you? When I read statements like that from people that know me personally personally, I knew it didn't occur to me to say "hate the children on the street". I know it didn't work out well for your children. I am so thankful for that. The people who are doing this to these children and in reality do do all they can for them and not allow them to experience pain. People have said that my own kids don't hate the children at all, and I believe that there is no truth to that.
Just because we can't control something doesn't mean we have no choices. I need to address people outside of the comfort zone and tell them to never have children. People are more than willing to believe for their own personal survival and safety. And it doesn't take their own time to educate their children about the dangers of eating disorders.
Merry Christmas everyone!
Write a abhorrent or hateful opinion about us by following one of these three methods.
Step 3: Tell us What You Mean by Name First, start by telling us how we feel about this person. Ask us about the things they're feeling angry at, which they may not be. Then, you can list their name and your words. If there are no words, try to say something you don't want us to tell. This helps us think clearly about what we want to say, which can allow us better understanding of the behavior in question. Make some time for your writing to go along with this. After you've given ourselves a list of "funeral" links and other similar social media activities, make it a point to tell them what you mean; however, if it seems like they don't like or won't be receiving your personal response on social media, they might prefer not to engage in further social media interaction. You can find other ways to show your support by sending a message to someone directly asking you in writing that you think it's "an awful thing to do or a stupid thing." This could be a person that isn't sure how to respond to you, or simply don't want to be part of the conversation as a whole. This is great if you have already expressed your opinion (maybe you're just surprised that someone you love doesn't want to hear about it or that they'll have time to respond in detail before you do). If they say such
Write a abhorrent post by taking the "Caucasian women are bad," or calling them as "black" as the American media portrays them, is that really what Black Americans consider "problematic"? The media does not call a Black woman "problematic" because "she needs to start doing their thing." If someone goes to university and starts asking questions of the black student body about race in college, they might get the same result. So much for "Black women."
I agree with some of the things some media sources say or do say, but they say the wrong things about Black American youth. The media cannot tell a true story. The media can only tell its story if it doesn't believe in black identities. This is true of most things Black. The media fails to tell our truth. It should call out. It shouldn't have the will and the courage to do so. Let our voices matter. It is what they do that matters. Let Black youth and young adults have the opportunity to speak boldly and clearly, speak openly, make a real difference in their lives as they fight for their rights.
As I said, not all of the media has the power to tell the truth. The powers that be may not always control what our voices are heard. The media is a power-hungry beast.
I'll go ahead and quote from the article as written:
The New York Magazine ran this article on Black young men, starting with
Write a abhorrent example here. The reason we don't do the above is that we're talking about the case of a large corporation that needs to comply with a policy the CEO claims to support. The CEO has told his company that it's an important business in this world.
It's more telling that the CEOs of corporate companies, especially small companies that get their funding from unions, get their funding from the business community. The CEO of that business organization believes it's an important industry and believes its workers are better than others – that the jobs and wages they put into are better than other business people.
Write a abhorrent caricature of this group on their website, http://skeptic.org/2014/03/26/skeptic-group-to-put-women-in_8142388.html. It should be noted that this website is not in any way endorsed by, or affiliated with. Those posting on this website, whether directly or indirectly, are in no way endorsed by, or associated with, the Skeptic Group.
We note at the top of this site, on page 24, that the "Skeptic" group is "the name of one of the five most influential'social movements' in the United States. I was previously appointed by Sen. Rockefeller to head up the National Organization for Research and Education's Science Strategy [sic] and Policy Development and as a State Advisory Committee member for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [sic] in 1993 and 2001 [sic]. In 2004, after the collapse of the 'Great Recession' of 2008, Rockefeller created the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [sic] to help make the world better by improving the lives of people without jobs."
What this means is the Society of Skeptics is a well-funded, political organization that is extremely close to the Rockefeller Foundation. When John and I visited them in May of 2013, we were able to understand how close they were to both Rockefeller and their family. They told us of their "secret meeting" at Rockefeller's New York
Write a abhorrent comment. Post it on twitter and have your say. If you agree, you support free speech. #HaterBullies
—
More at HuffPo https://luminouslaughsco.etsy.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment